Clinical Studies

KP APSS OAPoster 140527b-1Kaiser Permanente Fontana Sleep Center Study 2014

  • 100% – ApneaRx performed the same as the more expensive custom made oral appliance

 

 

 

 

 

Kaiser PKP-APSS-OAPoster-130601ermanente Fontana Sleep Center Study 2013

  • 75% Slept better than usual
  • 75% Felt more refreshed than usual
  • 75% Rated comfort of device as good
  • 75% Snoring improved
  • 100% Preferred the OA (Oral Appliance – ApneaRX ) to CPAP

 

 

 

 

Sleep Medicine Study

In a Study conducted with the aid of Italian dentists. Oral Appliances were shown to have a beneficial effect on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).

  • 100% of patients with mild OSA achieved Optimal results (AHI<5)
  • 89.5% of patients with moderate OSA achieved Optimal results (AHI<5)
  • 90% of patients with severe OSA achieved Good results (AHI<15)

Sleep Medicine Sleep Apnea Oral Appliance Study 2013 pdf

Long-Term Effectiveness of Oral Appliance versus CPAP Therapy
and the Emerging Importance of Understanding Patient Preferences

Fernanda R. Almeida, DDS, MSc, PhD; Nick Bansback, PhD
Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

This study found MAS (mandibular advancement splints ) to be an effective alternative to CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure)
except for extremely and morbidly obese persons.

Journalsleep.org Study